Pitmen vs Guiseley AFC (Goals)
-
- Posts: 25364
- Joined: Sat Sep 17 2011 8:44 am
Re: Pitmen vs Guiseley AFC (Goals)
Thanks Ben - my computer is running even slower than the slo-mo, but I'm thinking that none of the goals were offside, and their keeper took a dive for our second, but then many of their players were doing that all game anyway
Don't worry. Mt 6:25-34
-
- Posts: 7012
- Joined: Fri Sep 30 2011 7:56 pm
- Location: Perton , South Staffs obviously
Re: Pitmen vs Guiseley AFC (Goals)
Glover may have been level after all, but I still reckon the ref should have blown up for a foul for the second. Made up for the blatant hand ball that was missed
-
- Posts: 5459
- Joined: Sun Oct 09 2011 11:23 am
Re: Pitmen vs Guiseley AFC (Goals)
I don't think there is a foul on the keeper for the second. He didn't come out with any conviction at all, but even so, we had a penalty appeal turned down for a blatant and obvious handball so it evens itself out.
Glover looks level with McCone for me, which makes him onside. Well done liner!
Glover looks level with McCone for me, which makes him onside. Well done liner!
We’re on our way, we’re on our way, to the EFL, we’re on our way (26/01/24)
-
- Posts: 4100
- Joined: Sat Sep 17 2011 9:45 am
Re: Pitmen vs Guiseley AFC (Goals)
Anyone notice that shove on McCone before it breaks for the other player to volley in their second.Lee K wrote:I don't think there is a foul on the keeper for the second. He didn't come out with any conviction at all, but even so, we had a penalty appeal turned down for a blatant and obvious handball so it evens itself out.
Glover looks level with McCone for me, which makes him onside. Well done liner!
The only thing in line with Glover for our third is the floodlight pylon - justice for a bunch of cheating %$£$%$£$ though.
MFL Div 1 2025